tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24504461.post1483450629500659818..comments2024-02-19T22:24:48.553-06:00Comments on Ite ad Thomam Institute: Heresies in the 1917 Codex?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24504461.post-71219680396474272592011-08-12T23:03:29.330-05:002011-08-12T23:03:29.330-05:00Mike,
It does not matter what you or any other am...Mike,<br /><br />It does not matter what you or any other amateur theologian may think about Trent's teaching on baptism of desire: the reality is that the approved theologians of the Church unanimously interpret Trent as teaching that. Case closed. It's not open to discussion.<br /><br />You can corroborate this by looking at any of the traditional manuals of theology, such as the BAC Don Pacohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13921692353515274589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24504461.post-68954379640133341732011-08-12T22:55:03.250-05:002011-08-12T22:55:03.250-05:00Paco -
C'mon, you know that you're not g...Paco - <br /><br />C'mon, you know that you're not going to fool people that the Council of Trent taught "baptism of desire".<br /><br />One Section 7.3 I list five (5) sources of Dogma where the Council of Trent re-affirms the Water Baptism (only) Dogma ... and three (3) Sources of Dogma which specify that men cannot reach a state of justification (sanctified state) by "Mike Bizzarohttp://immaculata-one.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24504461.post-55259160920197812572011-08-12T22:04:06.086-05:002011-08-12T22:04:06.086-05:00Let me correct something I said, Mike. Upon close...Let me correct something I said, Mike. Upon closer examination, I confused you with the even-more-radical group that Ryan C. mentioned.<br /><br />(Amazing that no matter how far right you go, there seem to be people to <i>your</i> right.<br /><br />Anyway, if I understand you correctly, you seem to think Pope Leo was pope, and so was Pius X (although he's not a saint). It's at BenedictDon Pacohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13921692353515274589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24504461.post-12488258791807953662011-08-12T22:03:57.209-05:002011-08-12T22:03:57.209-05:00Dr. I think you understood my post and Michael'...Dr. I think you understood my post and Michael's position. Now Michael please correct me if I am wrong but your position is that Pius X was the last valid pope while it is the position of David Landry of WCM and of his friends that Pius IX was the last valid pope. Would I be correct in this summary of your distinct beliefs recarding the last valid (in your opinion) claiment to the Papal Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24504461.post-24104864726676492812011-08-12T21:52:27.396-05:002011-08-12T21:52:27.396-05:00Mike,
1) You are extreme. I am not name-calling....Mike,<br /><br />1) You are extreme. I am not name-calling. It is a well-deserved adjective. Your claiming that the popes from Leo XIII on are anti-popes should give you a clue. So should your confidence in telling me that I am going to hell.<br /><br />2) Baptism of desire is infallibly taught by the Council of Trent. I know you will deny this, but this is how the approved theologians have Don Pacohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13921692353515274589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24504461.post-65318010996579554312011-08-12T21:39:33.950-05:002011-08-12T21:39:33.950-05:00Anonymous -
Instead of the purposeless name call...Anonymous - <br /><br />Instead of the purposeless name calling like "extreme" ... perhaps you can take a look through Sections 20, 20.1, and 20.2 of Immaculata-one.com ... where I list the amazing heresies of the anti-Popes that set up the Vatican-2 "council" of apostasy ... and describe to us all why <b>you</b> think they are not heresies.<br /><br />Also heretic Dave LandryMikehttp://immaculata-one.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24504461.post-11928353822416991032011-08-12T21:22:56.308-05:002011-08-12T21:22:56.308-05:00Paco
Your headed for Hell.
Name ONE and ONLY ONE...Paco<br /><br />Your headed for Hell.<br /><br />Name ONE and ONLY ONE citation that teaches your Satanic "baptism of desire" heresy IN A DOGMATIC VENUE ... the Popes in union with the bishops of the world.<br /><br />Name ONE.Mikehttp://immaculata-one.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24504461.post-50428060159591308792011-08-12T20:43:10.223-05:002011-08-12T20:43:10.223-05:00I'm sorry, Mike, but if those doctrines are &q...I'm sorry, Mike, but if those doctrines are "heresies" then all the theologians and even doctors and Fathers of the Church (and even Popes in their catechisms et alia) are heretics, and not saints, and the Church erred in canonizing them.<br /><br />What you propose is just not worth being taken seriously.<br /><br />(By the way, "heaven by ignorance" is your invention; Don Pacohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13921692353515274589noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24504461.post-19553466641639893292011-08-12T19:01:20.481-05:002011-08-12T19:01:20.481-05:00Blog authors - if you keep the heresies of "b...Blog authors - if you keep the heresies of "baptism of desire", "baptism of blood", "Heaven by ignorance", etc. -- on your blog you will continue on your current path of being headed for Hell.<br /><br />I compiled the Immaculata-one.com cited on your heretical blog in the comment above at the "site" link.<br /><br />The Catholic Water Baptism Dogma (19 of Mikehttp://immaculata-one.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24504461.post-28833946385968135192011-08-12T14:43:49.895-05:002011-08-12T14:43:49.895-05:00Perhaps Dr. you could one day write a Thomistic re...Perhaps Dr. you could one day write a Thomistic refutation of sites such as this one. One website that I know of of even more extreme than this one is the Willing Catholic Martyr blogspot and its associated websites. They hold Bl. Pius IX to have been the last valid pope and since Pope Leo XIII dedicated himself to the revitalization of Thomistic thought I think it would be a worthy endeavor to Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com